<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PostSharp RC2 Released (And Code Analysis&#8230;)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.rev-net.com/ddewinter/2008/02/24/postsharp-rc2-released-and-code-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.rev-net.com/ddewinter/2008/02/24/postsharp-rc2-released-and-code-analysis/</link>
	<description>A Developer's Melting Pot: LINQ to SQL, Entity Framework, .NET Security...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 01:28:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gael Fraiteur</title>
		<link>http://blogs.rev-net.com/ddewinter/2008/02/24/postsharp-rc2-released-and-code-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Gael Fraiteur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 04:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.rev-net.com/ddewinter/?p=50#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Sorry to hear that CGA does not solve everything.

It seems like I will have to integrate some MSBuild-based solution as well. However, I would prefer the approach of making a copy of the original assembly and redirect only the Code Analysis task to this copy. Copying back modified files to original files at the last moment is maybe a little brittle, because other tasks may rely on the &quot;final&quot; assembly lying in obj\$(Configuration).

I guess Microsoft should donate me their expensive VSTS so that I can test the solution... Anyway, instead of waiting for the improbable, I will do it with a trial edition ;).

Gael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to hear that CGA does not solve everything.</p>
<p>It seems like I will have to integrate some MSBuild-based solution as well. However, I would prefer the approach of making a copy of the original assembly and redirect only the Code Analysis task to this copy. Copying back modified files to original files at the last moment is maybe a little brittle, because other tasks may rely on the &#8220;final&#8221; assembly lying in obj\$(Configuration).</p>
<p>I guess Microsoft should donate me their expensive VSTS so that I can test the solution&#8230; Anyway, instead of waiting for the improbable, I will do it with a trial edition <img src='http://blogs.rev-net.com/ddewinter/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>Gael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
